Lay Off the SEO Google Juice – Or Get an Ear Full of Cider

Are you in the business of tricking Google? Anyone playing SEO games involving link buys, crappy pages that inflate page count, and valueless social links probably is.

The next time you’re thinking of trying to outsmart Google, recall the words of  Sky Masterson, from Guys & Dolls.

My daddy told me,Son, someday a guy is going to walk up to you with a deck of cards on which the seal has not yet been broken. And he is going to offer to wager you that he can make the jack of spades jump out of this deck and squirt cider in your ear.

But son, you will not take this bet, for as sure as you do, you will wind up with an ear full of cider.”

This quote came to mind when I was thinking about Google’s search results, of all things. Thanks to Google’s reputation and its clean, spare design, those results always appear objective. The pages are populated with organic rankings that live side-by-side with paid advertising, magically separated by invisible layers of technology.

It is vital for Google to preserve the appearance and reality of this separation. If there is ever reason to question the integrity of organic search as the pure function of its objective search algorithm, the company is sunk.

European Regulators Are Watching Google’s Response
In order to keep the search results “pure,” the company has initiated broad changes that have effected many results. One of those results called into question the rankings achieved by JC Penney. Some thought making “manual adjustments” would mean these changes would remain localized. That’s not in the cards.

Making high profile “manual adjustments” would invite regulation and fines from EU regulators. They will ask, quite reasonably: if Google’s rankings are objective and driven by an algorithm,  then why do high-visibility penalties have to be assigned by a manual process? Are other business choices being made by hand behind the scenes?

Google will now move heaven and earth to automatically assign Penney, and other corporate “SEO innovators,” to whatever page they deserve to be on. Prepare for screams from many more businesses that rely on organic search and have tried to do improve their rankings with various tricks.

However, screaming is about all they can do: There is no higher court of appeal when Google reorganizes. No amount of lawyers or PR gets one back from the sixth page of search-results hell. (All is not lost, though. Based on my personal experience, I can tell you that time, and a good relationship with a Google rep, can work wonders.)

The Listing of Down-Ranked “Search Losers” Has Already Started. (via Guardian UK)

  • The British Medical Journal, the respected medical resource.
  • PR Newswire, which pumps out press releases on behalf of companies, and so is often a mirror of what appears elsewhere, on companies’ sites.
  • Slideshare, a sort of social site organized around sharing presentations online.
  • Technorati, the once-great, now-fading blog indexer.

Want an Ear Full of Cider?
So it’s time for firms to lay off tricks that generate SEO Google juice.  JC Penney took a risk that paid off until it didn’t. Now the retailer has a reputational bill to pay to Google.  This shouldn’t be a shock: If guys who rent servers for $3/month are on to a search trick, it shouldn’t be a surprise that Google’s 20,000 or so staff figure it out too.

In nature, the shortest distance between two points is rarely a straight line. Try hiking across streams and rocks in a perfectly straight line. It’s just not natural. Google knows when something isn’t natural, too. If you’re paying for “straight line progress” this is about to become a liability.

Working with people who promise they can jump results to the top of SERPs (Search Engine Results Pages) is a lot like making the jack of spades squirt cider. When all is said and done, these people are never the ones who have to dry the wet ears, or pay the reputational debts.


































Its Time to Lay Off the SEO Google Juice

The next time you’re thinking of trying to out-smart Google remember the words of the great Sky Masterson:

My daddy told me,Son, someday a guy is going to walk up to you with a deck of cards on which the seal has not yet been broken. And he is going to offer to wager you that he can make the jack of spades jump out of this deck and squirt cider in your ear. But son, you will not take this bet, for as sure as you do, you will wind up with an ear full of cider.’”

This quote came to mind when I was thinking about Google’s search results, of all things. Thanks to Google’s reputation and its clean, spare design those results always appear so objective. The pages are populated with organic rankings which live side-by-side with paid advertising, magically separated by invisible layers of technology. It is vital for Google to preserve the appearance and reality of this separation. If the integrity of organic search as the pure function of its objective search algorithm ever has reason to be questioned then the company is sunk.

In order to keep the search results “pure” the company has initiated broad changes that have effected many results. One of those results called into question the rankings achieved by JC Penney. They were so suspect that some expected Google to drop the hammer. However, if Google were to penalize Penney for actions taken to achieve these results, it would have to do so manually. Basically, Google would just decide where Penney will appear in search results.

Unfortunately doing this would invite regulations and fines from EU regulators. They will ask – quite reasonably – if Google’s rankings are objective and driven by an algorithm, then why do high-visibility penalties have to be assigned by a manual process? What other business choices are being made invisibly by hand. Google will now move heaven and earth to automatically assign Penney, and other corporate “SEO leaders”, to whatever page it deserves to be on?

Prepare for screams from many more businesses that rely on organic search and have tried to do improve their rankings with various tricks. However, screaming is about all they can do: There is no higher court of appeal when Google reorganiz

Its Time to Lay Off the SEO Google Juice

The next time you’re thinking of trying to out-smart Google remember the words of the great Sky Masterson:

My daddy told me,Son, someday a guy is going to walk up to you with a deck of cards on which the seal has not yet been broken. And he is going to offer to wager you that he can make the jack of spades jump out of this deck and squirt cider in your ear. But son, you will not take this bet, for as sure as you do, you will wind up with an ear full of cider.’”

This quote came to mind when I was thinking about Google’s search results, of all things. Thanks to Google’s reputation and its clean, spare design those results always appear so objective. The pages are populated with organic rankings which live side-by-side with paid advertising, magically separated by invisible layers of technology. It is vital for Google to preserve the appearance and reality of this separation. If the integrity of organic search as the pure function of its objective search algorithm ever has reason to be questioned then the company is sunk.

In order to keep the search results “pure” the company has initiated broad changes  that have effected many results. One of those results called into question the rankings achieved by JC Penney. They were so suspect that some expected Google to drop the hammer. However, if Google were to penalize Penney for actions taken to achieve these results, it would have to do so manually. Basically, Google would just decide where Penney will appear in search results.

Unfortunately doing this would invite regulations and fines from EU regulators. They will ask – quite reasonably – if Google’s rankings are objective and driven by an algorithm,  then why do high-visibility penalties have to be assigned by a manual process? What other business choices are being made invisibly by hand. Google will now move heaven and earth to automatically assign Penney, and other corporate “SEO leaders”, to whatever page it deserves to be on?

Prepare for screams from many more businesses that rely on organic search and have tried to do improve their rankings with various tricks. However, screaming is about all they can do: There is no higher court of appeal when Google reorganizes. No amount of lawyers or PR gets one back from the 6th page of search results hell. (All is not lost, though. Based on my personal experience, I can tell you that time and a good relationship with a Google rep can work wonders.)

So, its time for firms to lay off tricks that generate SEO Google Juice . JC Penney took a risk that paid off for a time, and now it as a reputational bill to pay with Google.  This should be a surprise.

Other firms would now do well to learn from this lesson and stay away from the people who make promises about the jack of spades squirting cider. When all is said and done, they are never the ones who have to clean up the wet ears, or pay reputational debts.

es. No amount of lawyers or PR gets one back from the 6th page of search results hell. (All is not lost, though. Based on my personal experience, I can tell you that time and a good relationship with a Google rep can work wonders.)

So, its time for firms to lay off tricks that generate SEO Google Juice . JC Penney took a risk that paid off for a time, and now it as a reputational bill to pay with Google. This should be a surprise.

Other firms would now do well to learn from this lesson and stay away from the people who make promises about the jack of spades squirting cider. When all is said and done, they are never the ones who have to clean up the wet ears, or pay reputational debts.

5 Responses to "Lay Off the SEO Google Juice – Or Get an Ear Full of Cider"

  • Barbara Bix

    March 22, 2011

    Hi Dave,

    Thanks for your post on SEO rules.

    You mention that PR Newswire is penalized because it mirrors other sites. I’m hoping you can answer a question I have: Does Google penalize mirrored sites that use the canonical reference to the original site?

  • [...] +1 is Also Promising to Google’s Future 1. It gives searchers a reason to use Google signed-in rather than anonymously. This means they can build richer records of individuals use of search and better target ads. 2. It expands the public use for the Google profile page, which can be built in to a future social networking play. 3. It is an answer to Facebook’s like button which is already on about 2 million websites. 4. It is an innovation that moves the public spotlight off Google’s struggle with link farms and SEO gamesmanship. [...]

  • [...] The periodic table seems so clear cut, even though competitive SEO uses techniques that can trigger “violating” factors. So while the periodic table seems all clean and certain, the most competitive SEO might better be plotted as a blackjack table instead. [...]

  • click here

    December 24, 2012

    WOW just what I was searching for. Came here by searching for
    referencement google

  • [...] dig reading The Canterbury Tales in favor of a skill-based certificate in a promising field such as Search Engine Optimization. How many times have you heard someone say to a college kid, “So what are you going to do with a [...]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>