Lindsay Lohan vs. E-Trade: Rights of Personal Publicity Gone Wrong
According to the New York Post, actress Lindsay Lohan is suing E-Trade for $100 million for pain and suffering caused by their Super Bowl ad.
The semi-funny (and non-compelling) ad shows a milkaholic baby named Lindsay (or Lindsey) with a guilty looking baby-husband. Yes, the ad is pretty terrible; so is the legal claim. However, so much passes for online defamation lately, it is unwise to laugh this off entirely.
Lohan’s lawyer, Stephanie Ovadia, stakes out a wafer-thin claim of Personal Publicity.
“Many celebrities are known by one name only, and E-Trade is using that knowledge to profit…They used the name Lindsay as a parody of her life. Why didn’t they use the name Susan? This is a subliminal message. Everybody’s talking about it and saying it’s Lindsay Lohan.”
If this line of complaint was allowed to stand, just imagine the case members of the Kennedy family would have against The Simpsons over Mayor Quimby. A cultural reference isn’t use of personal publicity, and a lucky judge in Nassau County will get to hold forth on this.
PETA’s Tiger Woods ad is a better case for the Right of Personal Publicity.
Ouch!
5 Responses to "Lindsay Lohan vs. E-Trade: Rights of Personal Publicity Gone Wrong"
May 21, 2010
Thanks for sharing the post.
I like your style. It is wonderful.
April 24, 2014
It can be a classic nice and handy item of info. I am happy that you just provided this handy info along with us. Remember to stay united states current like this. Many thanks for spreading.
October 2, 2020
This is the best place on the web if you are looking for sex basel and hot ladies for a nice chat
June 29, 2021
casual sex south england is the most popular web place for free sexy chat with local ladies in UK
December 23, 2021
Shemale Wien is web platform for casual contacts and sexy chat with hot shemales in EU