<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boston Police Charge Those Who Videotape Arrests as &#8220;Wire Tappers&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://usefularts.us/2010/02/22/boston-record-arrest-wiretap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://usefularts.us/2010/02/22/boston-record-arrest-wiretap/</link>
	<description>Online Law Blog: How trademark, copyright, privacy and politics shape the Web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:55:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: battery-stores</title>
		<link>http://usefularts.us/2010/02/22/boston-record-arrest-wiretap/#comment-7553</link>
		<dc:creator>battery-stores</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 08:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usefularts.us/?p=3971#comment-7553</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should photography of police be illegal?</title>
		<link>http://usefularts.us/2010/02/22/boston-record-arrest-wiretap/#comment-7271</link>
		<dc:creator>Should photography of police be illegal?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usefularts.us/?p=3971#comment-7271</guid>
		<description>[...] photography of police be illegal?     http://usefularts.us/2010/02/22/bost...rrest-wiretap/      This week the ACLU filed a lawsuit against the Boston Police Department for using [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] photography of police be illegal?     <a href="http://usefularts.us/2010/02/22/bost...rrest-wiretap/" rel="nofollow">http://usefularts.us/2010/02/22/bost&#8230;rrest-wiretap/</a>      This week the ACLU filed a lawsuit against the Boston Police Department for using [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aubrey</title>
		<link>http://usefularts.us/2010/02/22/boston-record-arrest-wiretap/#comment-7269</link>
		<dc:creator>Aubrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usefularts.us/?p=3971#comment-7269</guid>
		<description>James- why is audio more problematic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James- why is audio more problematic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://usefularts.us/2010/02/22/boston-record-arrest-wiretap/#comment-7268</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 03:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usefularts.us/?p=3971#comment-7268</guid>
		<description>The MA law is outrageous, yes. 

For the time being, it is unquestionably legal to *video* record any activity seen in a public setting. Audio on a recording device is much more problematic and should be disabled by anyone seeking to record public protests, police misbehavior, etc.

Let&#039;s tell our lawmakers to amend this bad legislation. It does the police and the public no good to limit the oversight of these civil servants as they &quot;serve and protect.&quot; I applaud the ACLU and others who sue police departments and officers that knowingly obstruct even the limited audio/video rights we currently have.

Thanks, Dave. It&#039;s a good topic that should be discussed more often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The MA law is outrageous, yes. </p>
<p>For the time being, it is unquestionably legal to *video* record any activity seen in a public setting. Audio on a recording device is much more problematic and should be disabled by anyone seeking to record public protests, police misbehavior, etc.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s tell our lawmakers to amend this bad legislation. It does the police and the public no good to limit the oversight of these civil servants as they &#8220;serve and protect.&#8221; I applaud the ACLU and others who sue police departments and officers that knowingly obstruct even the limited audio/video rights we currently have.</p>
<p>Thanks, Dave. It&#8217;s a good topic that should be discussed more often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

